I can't refute that argument directly. Point for you.
Wrong. God in the past and even today made sure that the truth is out there. God also in the past and now not only spread his words thru the world by people but Christ also can speak to people in dreams and visions. Many Muslims and I am sure others say they have dreams and visions about Jesus and they do not know why. Many Muslins who are migrating out of those Muslin countries because of the wars and pouring into nations where the gospel is being preached. Many of these Muslims are coming to Christ. I even heard that there is an growing numbers of people in China is also coming to Christ. In China and North Korea, Germany, Iran, Iraq, and in some of these nations, Christians are being persecuted. But my point is that name any nation that a Christian is not in. They are in every nation. So the gospel is being preached but once they hear it, it is up to them to accept it or reject it. Just like that decision has been giving to you and your family. One other thing, even if some people are preaching the gospel some people, because of the harden of their hearts and their minds are closed, they cannot hear or understand the gospel. Jesus will say sometime why you cannot understand what I am saying. The bible says that the Satan(the god of this world) has blinded the minds of the unsaved. 'And even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing. The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel that displays the glory of Christ, who is the Image of God" 2 Corinthians 4:3-4. It also states in state in the bible. "And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached unto all nation for a witness and then the end shall come." Matt. 24:14. This is what going on right now. For God the Father love us so that He gave His only Son that whosoever believe or accept Jesus Christ shall have everlasting life.
When you have virtually unlimited resources such as the royals have as many as you want. It?s not like you have to see them or spend time with them or anything.
You are the one espousing eugenics
Says the fundie.
Facts are not up for interpretation. Evidence, yes. Facts, no.
To clarify, I upvoted because I agree with you on rape culture being a 'catch-all' term.... I'm not upvoting that you were violently raped.
I've plainly stated my point multiple times.
Let me guess...you don?t consider life experiences to be evidence of anything?
By the way, I do oppose Christian indoctrination in non Christian areas, like in public schools for example, but for other reasons.
No, she is related to her husband William. Distantly.
Renata has some serious problems, and a history of making false claims.
They can be built (e.g. paper versions, computer versions). Or they can arise (e.g. RNA, DNA and cells), or they may evolve (ibid.), or they could form by happenstance (noise).
A violent totalitarian ideology should not be feared, it should be studied, to make correct decisions. Do you fear Communism or [email protected]
? If you do, better stop, fear doesn't help solving problems.
Defining "change" as "experiential" and "changeless" as "frozen, changeless, eternal," makes no sense (and in the second case is circular).
It'll be interesting to see the next few polls if Liberal supporters jump over to the NDP candidate especially where the races are close. Look at Ajax for example, currently the PCs are taking it but it's still close and if Liberal supporters jump to the NDP based on this it could easily swing to the NDP.
So you have no proof?
Violence by Bundy militia, Virginia Right wing idiot killing one injuring
That is correct, at least by this definition:
This loss by the Ontario Liberals all but ensures a federal Liberal win in 2019. It's a votimg trend of provincial politics in Ontario almost as consistent as the laws of thermodynamics.
You poor unfortunate soul.
No, I know.
Bro, not to be repetitive, but I don't care what you believe.
Honestly though, what do "Darwinists" have to do with ANY of this? There are no scientists in the credible group that can be considered "Darwinists", and if there are any that fit that mold, they are not taken seriously at all by the credible scientists. You are focusing on a group that holds no sway over the progress of science, which is why most people are just ignoring your questions.
I can haz link pls?
Still eagerly awaiting a single solitary denier to have the balls to post the citations to the peer-reviewed scientific papers published in scientific refereed journals that falsifies AGW.
That makes no sense. The sky is not what the cloud is. They are separate. The cloud forms in the sky but they are not the same thing. You're trying so hard to sound intelligent I
No. It's not. I don't have to justify my belief to you or to anyone else.
Dynbrake, thank for your thoughtful response. Interpretation is a tricky thing (as we see with Luke 17:21). Do you see that, logically, an "infallible" author who "cannot produce error" leaves nothing to be discovered or recognized as true? It is already assumed. You've already deemed it "true" no matter what it does or doesn't look like. There is nothing "investigate" or "discover" because it couldn't be otherwise, just based on the logic of presupposition.
I have come across a few. Must be those cold winters!