-we all know who has the money and the power in this struggle-
The RCC (Raping Children Corporation, yes I said it, and you can be mad) needs to go and I hope Ireland repeals the abortion ban. They need to catch up to the 21st century already.
you get a 10% off voucher on your next purchase at
I'm not sure what you mean by 'ring species failed'. My understanding is that the theory goes: wherever a species starts off in a ring environment (no crossing over) it tends to accumulate different small changes in each direction as it spreads around the ring. By the time the two legs meet on the far side of the ring they have changed sufficiently that they can no longer breed with each other and are thus different species, even though each is not much different to its neighbours on its own side of the ring. So if you start at one end of the ring and follow round to the other, you will never find where any species change occurs because each organism can breed with those on either side of it, yet the start and end organisms cannot breed with each other. A perfect example of gradualism in action.
Okay, its not 99%. Its only 98%. Is that better, little fella? Would you like any more concessions?
if Chrysler's began its business by killing workers but after they cornered the market decided, let's stop murdering our workers, you'd be ok with that?
Sheesh, I meant to nudge but it was in order to desensitize you to such a common word. It would make your life and my life much better if we didn't get annoyed by such little things.
YOU may not mark anything that is spam, but that discussion channel sure the hell did. And my response is in response to that moderator stating my comments were spam, when they were clarifications of what I was speaking of. Just because she disagreed with my point of view does not make it spam comments.
You think he knew what he was doing. Yet your opinion is just that: an opinion.
Who else's responsibility would it be to back up your claims that you made yourself?
What do you mean "against" in your first sentence?
no. I believe there needs to be sufficient and credible evidence
Yeah those teachers are all COMMUNISTS anyway!
How well are you familiar with it? Prophet Muhammad killed, banished or enslaved every man and woman who refused to submit to Islam.
You are welcome. Good luck with your pooch.
N what?s dis name ?ts yo mommy??
He is right. I dont want to see some pig eating in the train. Tough shit
Nope. It is hard for Love to force.
It's not at all a scapegoat, it is how people get paid and build wealth.
Even Darwin, towards the end of his life, admitted the possiblity of intelligent design after a study of the structure of the eye. Though he didn't completely switch opinions, he concluded that when looking at something as complex as the eye, one couldnt' rule out design. It's published, not a secret
It depends on the dress length and the situation.
If that is what it takes for you to do so; knock yourself out, me ol' china.
Why is that?
And now you are violating his right to self determination and pursuit of happiness and elevating another's right over his.
That assumes XX or XY chromosomes are a determining factor to sexuality, not just biological sex. Having an attraction does not in and of itself prove that one is born with a specific sexual orientation.
Oh lordly, by the 90's, I was on my second marriage and had a child, no freedom there for me! LOL
Amen. I've had men straight up try and argue with me that it's the same for women too.
And test scripture too. Which brings us back full circle to whether to always read it literally or not. ;-)
I don't know how you can say men make a good/fair society when history tells a completely different story.
a clitoris is shockingly NOT actually a little man in a boat
The first amendment guarantees our right to free expression. My driving habits are a form of speech!
I even learn from the opposite argument. I mean, it's weird that I remember alternate theories to evolution from the time Darwin published... but asking "well, what's evolution alternate to if it's the only non-theistic answer?" is a good question that I happen to have the answer to: there are 'wrong' answers we're no longer pursuing.
I just got here about half an hour ago. I spent some time answering the questions. Quite a few of them were begging the question by assuming their argument was true before asking the question.