There is NO ban on a person in the legislature that keeps them from practicing their religion. The ban comes into play when theists who are legislative attempts to create and pass laws based on their religious beliefs.
When specifically is the era ending?
The feminist critique of video games is that by teaching boys that the princess is the "reward" for overcoming obstacles, video games give boys an objectified and disrespectful understanding of women. It's a critique I agree with -- however, rom coms do the same thing.
"AM I POOPING???!!!"
Humans evolved they were not created. Humans created God and not just yours but many Gods all equally imaginary.
any chance that you'll STAY in Netherlands?? PLEASE......
I'm from a traditional culture so I have a traditional due and I am cool with having a more traditional role. If that aint you, then go get your life by asking him. The result is the same.
1) First, I don't see the rational either side has in attacking the other. I'm an atheist and the only time I really care about what the alleged believers are doing is if what they are doing negatively impacts me. For the record though, I have found being rational and objective not really a strong suit for those trying to debate their religious beliefs. In fact, I've found that those that apply rationale and objectively to just about every other thing in life will not be so stringent when it comes to their religion.
My daughter is the same. It will be -15 degrees and I have to fight with her to wear her winter coat because she doesn't think her winter coat is fashionable. SMH!!
Thank's for the thoughtful response mate. I thoroughly agree on all points. Institutions, like people and weather, change over time. It's important to have the nuance to judge them by the standards as they pertained to the time in question, rather than trying to apply the standards of today to the actions of an institution hundreds of years ago.
Whether something is ok or not ok is entirely up to the person himself, everything is your choice and decisions, other stuff are just factors to what u decide is right or wrong
I had a problem with this episode when it came out. Seems like PR by Denmark Tourism. These superficial surveys on who is the happiest, etc, really need to be checked through. They seem like marketing puffs. Problem is when someone like Gupta is giving it marks then everyone believes it to be true and forgets the details when something like the burqah ban comes out.
You thought that somehow proved you right?
Your comment is spot on....I think it would be a huge mistake for JT to expand the trade war so I am hoping his team has something to offer Trump to reduce the tariffs. They won't be evaporated but there is room for negotiation. Having said that, threats by Trudeau to expand the tariff war will be very bad news for Canadians. I hope he is mature enough to understand that.
It is easier to talk about the Ashkanazi once one has an understanding of where they came from and history from 500-1000 AD, you never hear the preachers talk about.
No, you are wrong. Theism is nothing more than the answer to the question "Do you believe in God" THAT IS IT. For any type of code or dogma, you need a specific denomination of theism.
That is only your opinion ...
In order to properly conduct a historical analysis, historians can't start from the premise that the Gospels and the other writings in the New Testament are inspired scripture. They examine them as though they're just ancient writings.
Are you talking about Dune? I never got into it.
So what? No evidence=no evidence=forget it!
Then your standards are awfully low and speaking of low standards, care to describe my beliefs. The only sounding like an idiot--and a dishonest idiot at that--is you.