"Most of them involve logic and proof of why Biblical events didn't take place."
No true, another lie!!!!!
Don't pull the plug!! (Too late....lol)
You said they ENTIRELY did away with the fleeing felon rule. I'm simply pointing out to you that isn't accurate. They simply limited the circumstances when an officer can shoot a fleeing felon. Shooting a non-violent felon isn't lawful for example. Shooting a violent felon that clearly has the desire to continue a rampage is indeed justified. Stop getting so offended over a discussion. I didn't insult you personally.
Perhaps you missed the 2nd part of the bible. It is called the new testament.
And our teeny tiny brains don't werk right sometimes! : )
Welcome back, Un! Air not working suuuuux
I'm on the wrong side of 25 now but IRL people still accuse me of being like 16 and attempt to throw me out of the bars. Can't win here.
"It's legal to follow you in public 1 foot behind and park in front of your house day after day after day. I'm not plotting anything. I just happened to be there, right?"
Show your work... Oh right, you can't.
Same. A decent home in Chester County PA is up there
Awwwww, poor bigot can't accept the words that describe him. :(
I mean, a bunch of straight white guys say we dont need discrimination laws, that makes sense, right?
Did Jesus say that we shouldn't help those who are poor if it is because they made poor choices?
I did Google it, and got no results which is why I asked.
That's a nonstarter. Holy Spirit and spiritual are essentially meaningless terms in the goal of understanding written text.
What the heck are you talking about? What ignorant and unfair thing has been done to you? Did the DoJ choose to legalise by affiliation hate groups that continually assault your rights? Did SCOTUS choose religion over your civil liberties? Did Trump endanger your friends in the middle east? Did you have to take phone calls from them crying because they could see missiles overhead (not so unusual for the area but it didn't have to be)? Maybe your main form of recourse was assaulted by the President and VP in a national spectacle that showed how many people will blindly piss on the constitution with them in one of the more overt displays of racism in modern history?
* They're unable to round up or down when splitting the bill.
You mean those bastards were interpreting the Constitution and telling the Executive Branch when they were in violation of it? How dare they?!?
If, at any time in narrative and/or context, it states that the universe and the earth were created, together, at the same time, I would agree. I, however, do not see that it does, and for anyone to so staunchly hold that it does, again, without conceding that the language AND context allows for a completely different understanding is, indeed, "Sigh." lol We should discuss other works. I would enjoy completely missed plot lines! Perhaps Huck Finn? lol History in general must be fascinating.....
I'm inclined to think Christophobia (I think you've got an extra syllable in your proposed spelling Gilette) could be as serious a problem as Islamophobia.
The OP was inspired by a few different sources.
Science tends to concern practical how; religion tends to concern moral why. Science does not show ought; religion does not show is. They both have a role for our conceptual communications. Respect for the spiritual worth of others can inspire regard for their freedom of expression, provided religion does not deteriorate into authoritative force that subjugates free thinking.
I put no great store in the 'our' part of perception...just to make it clearer, I'm the same way about 'my'perception...but I do put some store in the words supposedly inscribed on the Oracle at Delphi:
Sure define things as you would like them defined.