Yonris 05.01.2018
so, you feel an atheists opinion on a matter reflects all of atheism?
Arashigis 11.01.2018
They believe more starting kinds were created, but evolution varied life from there.
Saramar 16.01.2018
In fact, I know a few men who experienced quite literally the same thing... wives who forced them to create "joint" facebook accounts and banished them from poker night because they were worried about where they were, while they themselves had ongoing sexual extramarital affairs with other men- in once case, in a parking lot at work.... Sometimes people guilty of things project their guilt onto others.
Akilar 17.01.2018
For many, there is no choice, no viable alternative.
Yozshull 20.01.2018
we could hang them, too. But not by their necks.
Faemi 23.01.2018
I agree the added benefit is it generally pisses off the general god of Abraham believer.
Nenris 30.01.2018
Sorry but marriage is under definition and usage of the state and really always has. The state allows or deputizes people to perform the ritual of setting up a contract between two people. And then decides when that contract is no longer accepted. The individual may served or not serve the couple depending on tradition and established law. Churches as institutions may allow or not allow certain things or actions. So a church may admit or not certain persons provided they do not break the law. Businesses also may admit or reject upon certain visible characteristics based upon good order as defined by society. So they may require a certain dress code, but if they allow them in, then once in they must not refuse equal service. And the reason for non-admittance must be correctable or changeable. Can?t change skin color or sexual orientation. But you can refrain from certain activities. A religious institution can seat men seperately from women but if they allow mixing they cannot refuse a gay couple from sitting together provided they maintain decorum.
Fedal 08.02.2018
There you go then.
Mazuzuru 12.02.2018
ok, little trumpie
Arajar 14.02.2018
Therefore, you suggest we don't tax, say, Wall Street at all. Right?
Moogulrajas 15.02.2018
Apply what you say to love or honor.
Gura 25.02.2018
Because the Roman's who controlled criminal justice in Judea didn't much care about religious preachers unless they were considered a threat to order and the authority of the state, Paul was a roman citizen and afforded latitude, Jesus was a Jew who was being promoted in some quarters as "King of the Jews". Jesus was a threat to roman rule, Paul was not.
Arashilmaran 27.02.2018
I don't follow your point here.
Shaktidal 07.03.2018
That's a bigoted narrow-minded prejudicial job of spin from you, Anna Nemo. Atheism is a materialist naturalist myth.
Voktilar 15.03.2018
Indeed. And the Romans spoke Latin and Greek, not 'Roman.' There was no 'Aramaic' civilization. There was a Hebrew one, certainly.
Vudosida 25.03.2018
Cool because some folks use that term to describe Young Earthers
Kazralabar 03.04.2018
Read the articles. Its not my understanding or opinion, its theirs
Gule 05.04.2018
Yep it does
Kazilabar 15.04.2018
"science is not a "theory""