Good, now just throw the secular humanism claptrap away as well and you will make real progress towards what is true.
Or a death-wish.
Those are opinions, not truth claims. It can be completely true that Person A thinks is it a great day and Person B thinks it is a crappy day. Being a great or crappy day is a subjective judgment inherently.
Probably the better way to say it is we can't control climate. And to pick CO2, because it is one of the weakest elements to effects temperature, is somewhat bizarre. The two most important things about temperature is the sun and H2O. I don't think we want to eliminate those. Temperature and CO2 are not in lockstep without manipulating the data. Virtually every computer models that climate scientists have has failed, they have to keep going in and tweaking the numbers until it looks somewhat like reality, that's not science.
The owner wasn't even there, and then she showed up and became the problem.
Wiki is not something to cite in an intelligent debate. Doesn?t mean truth is not held within
Do you have a copy of the curriculum, or just reactionary supposition of what "gender" means?
In-general, yup. Biblically, it goes beyond that for the context it is dealing with.
Lol, that looks like a stuffed, staged one! What about ferrets, my sister had a couple, they're pretty fun?
Damn right!! Brown on the inside, brown on the outside and still tender and juicy all over!!!
No, we shouldn't. We would only see the progression for evolving species. Take, say, sharks - they have found their perfect ecological niche, and almost don't change in the last 100 million of years or so.
I would gladly be faulted by the world in giving children a Bible, and to teach them from it fairly.
1. Have sex, both partners are responsible for the consequences. "Trapping" isn't possible, as already discussed. The physical consequences of a pregnancy are asymmetric by nature, i.e. men never carry babies, women always do, so the medical decisions are always up to the women - men are on the hook financially, limited only by the rationality of the court.
Like a Virgo? What's Madonna up to now?
You have to disprove "personal anecdotes" made up by self-serving fat folks... then Hud will deflect, again.
The Jesus character was not rich. Those that came up with him may have been.
The Word of God must be taken literally.
Youre a conservative, of course you need to lie!
Siddhartha Gautama offered a way to transcend the vicissitudes of human life--the suffering and the dissatisfactions.
A cancerous tumor has a full compliment of human DNA, and is living human tissue, just like a fetus. A discrete mass of human living tissue is indeed, human life. It is NOT a human being, but it is definitely human life. A functioning human hand can be considered human life, as well.
You don't ???