Not in large enough numbers to sustain the population. Non-religious wealthy liberal countries are only growing through immigration these days.
If illegal they absolutely are. Stand in line and hurry up and wait.
Based on his metaphysical reasoning.
So far, you're the closest I've seen to any of those things on this thread.
You are welcome. have a God blessed day.
I'm just keeping in focus... either supernature is functional or is not, IF it IS then it has a process ...so far zipp
when you make a claim and I ask proof, yup we use MY RULES
please do... I need some splainin' done proper... like why is it when....
I have no interest in tallying amounts, just pointing out that not all of the fundie Christians are exactly "I'll pray for you" type and many will use their religious beliefs to kill.
OMG! Can you imagine when you prove evolution false you will be no closer to verifying or proving ID or creationism is real or correct than when evolution was the answer.
I've received training in knowing what the f*ck the left wing is, since I'm part of it, and you are waaaaay off.
Now that I know what it means, I think most of my problems are PICNIC.
Good, now let's move on
Like your wedding, right?
This kind of release time is not uncommon.
I have been on it for almost 50 and I do remember most of them. So I can safely say it's at least 45 years old :-)
I think I agreed with you.
They are A reason. As opposed to beign random.
When she wanted a wax higher, it would be a bikini wax.
I'm familiar with Mr. Ehrman and his position. I'm also familiar with the counter arguments to his position and why he has made several, for lack of a better term, leaps of faith- with his faith.
That certainly makes sense. Other excellent scholars include EP Sanders, Paula Fredriksen, Dale Allison, Dale Martin and Larry Hurtado - all very qualified and respected historians. It's always worth it to see what a variety of scholars think on various issues. Some things they definitely disagree on, but there's quite a bit they do agree on.
LOL more like forgetful 65
well, that depends on how much effort you want to make. But it doesn't take much effort to listen to a historian speak on the subject, or archeologists. You can even find credible and qualified people online to listen to.
One could say your original comment was passive aggressive.
I hope he's gonna be ok.
"Everyone else is doing it!" does not save you from God's judgment. Christians are called to a higher ethical standard, and if that's your defense... you're in a lot of trouble.
What? That is possible the nuttiest comment today.
It's so satisfying during a shower to reach in and grab all the hair that is collecting in there LOL
Call it a fetus. Call it a human being. Shoot man, call it a person or an unborn baby. I don't honestly care what someone wants to call it. What it is, PC, is not your decision to make for someone other than yourself. Do you understand that basic reasoning? The discussion of abortion is, and always will be a very personal one. You've come across as some who's put some thought into this, and I can respect that. For me, abortion is not, and never will be, my decision to make. Neither is the legal definition of "person". But more so, is that I don't feel anyone has the right to dictate what decision a woman feels is right for her body and what is inside of it. I feel so strongly about it that it effects my decisions on where I spend my money and who I vote for under certain circumstances.
Jesus was given food and lodging and donkeys for travelling around telling stories. If jets had existed at that time, his followers would undoubtedly have bought him one.
Dude, people have been drawing sex on walls and everything else long before we mastered bronze. And if you think a one man wot 3 or more wives did not end up with some group sex here and there, you lack understanding of humanity and men.