My assertion is that no children should be denied healthcare coverage, whether or not their parents are here legally.
You would rule out the possibility that a higher intelligence, besides mother nature herself, is directing the growth of the human family, spiritually, over time?
No what I'm saying, but that's okay.
he said the tariffs were a National Security issue.
The pope does not support nor preach the Bible. Any ignoramus who says the Bible and Quran are basically the same doesn't even deserve a diploma for passing grade school.
The question is, how big of a linguistic inventory did pre-Islamic Arabic have? There may certainly have been a defensive cultural chauvinism. However, the Quran was engaging with religious intertexts from other languages. It may be that Muhammad simply didn't have a way to say what he wanted to say in his own language without borrowing heavily from Syriac (or Aramaic in general). We can look at the Syriac-speaking community in Malabar in India to see how far afield Syriac traveled via trade and how much influence it had as a trade language.
Which god and where did he tell you that?
Rosa Parks broke the law.
No, that is
No. He's Kenyan like Obama. Their families are friends
Not quite. "The end justifies the means" is yet another example of a moral code to validate. While it might work in some circumstances, over the long run, this approach becomes counterproductive. Among other things, because over the long run, one's reputation becomes extremely valuable - and this is a method to ruin it.
That's pretty speculative, but an interesting theory.
omg this woman. "I did four start-ups and home-school all my children. There's no excuse for being a lazy public school parent."
Thank you Anna, for your thoughts! ???????
Millions of dead Christians killed by the atheists in the USSR shows otherwise. It is not a myth. They were killed because they were not atheists. What lack of atheism were these Soviets adhering to?
In theory such evidence could come along. I am nowhere near arrogant enough to flat out state that there will never be any evidence for a god.
Did you read that in the article?
You know I am!
Absolutely correct. Well within the accepted vagaries of such a complex and multifaceted set of theories.
and both were done by people that you called idiotic
How do you come to that conclusion, based on what I wrote?
it's a ridiculous comparison
Again, yes it is. You keep ignoring the decisions of the Supreme Court.
So you agree its not true, so a myth. You can not have it both ways, Science proves the bibles myth totally wrong.
Josephus was not a contemporary historian of the time. He wasn't even born until after the events of which Christians wish to point took place.
Are we playing football? I haven't changed my statement. You are the one that doesn't want to see the facts. I will say it once again so you will see that I am not "moving goalposts" and I am not "cornered". Many people don't like homosexuals and they are not church goers. They like to drink and do drugs and cuss and sex but they don't like homosexuals. They are all around you if you would only look. They are normal people.
Christianity is declining in Europe because what the Christians believe in is wrong. On the other hand Islam is growing, God be Praised.