I am the one who asked. I think that any one who does work has a real job.
They remain blind to their own hypocrisies.
I have a rational fear of religion; it's the past that teaches us what the future will be.
It isn't about protecting religious liberty. It is about protecting everyone's rights. If he can be a bigot towards gays he can later target atheists.
that's untrue. Like everything in life, the misdeeds of a few cause laws for all
Alcohol content my friend...alcohol content...lmao
No they have a full support !
Internet commenting was a mistake.
Yes no doubt about it. ?? ??
True, but nothing of significance- including the products of their fruitfulness occurred in between their creation and their sin. Adam had already named all the living things, so there wasn't that to be done.
Coincidence. Bill Clinton came to power in the U.S. and presided over the single largest economic expansion in U.S. history. And you are giving his credit to Harris. Disgraceful.
Hmmm to me those are intertwined though. It really isn't what a man has got, but how he's using it lol.
He could have done more to propose better sentencing reform. And he could have done more to commute inappropriate sentences far earlier in his career. I'd give him credit had he at least TRIED...but I didn't see much in terms of effort.
>>?1. Christians are most certainly not a threat to civil rights, of course.?<<
Genesis only talks about the creation of the sun, Earth, and stars in depth. And even the stars are only created in relation to the Earth?s sky. The Bible?s ?universe? doesn?t expand to much outside of our planet.
If YOU cannot understand what John Adams was saying in that statement or any other? Then it is you who has the problem, not me.
The bible is known to be vastly unreliable and often incorrect. Many claims it makes have been proven false, such as the census. Dating is all over the place, so yeah it can be dismissed as unreliable.
knock off the personal insults Anton
4 people on the Court dissented. They were right. Obgerfell was unconstitutional.
imagine their nerve! Why they are enforcing the law! How dare they?
Awwww look at them go
There is a simple solution.
It's looking more and more like Comey was the gullible patsy. His "friends" used him.
if you are honest in what you believe, and that belief happens to have the Bible as it's book then you have honour it and follow it. So for men laying with another is a no no, but woman it is fine.
Because the OP gives some premises for granted, whereas I think that they should be explained and qualified.
The squib states only that Jesus MOST LIKELY addressed God as "abba." "Likely" does not equate to "did" and no full quote is cited. The only English mixer is you, Mr. (ha! ha!) History Buff.
Thats a nice little loophole you trying to create. That it has nothing to do with race. Come come now , surely by now you know I'm not like the other Christopher Hitchens wannabes on this forum .
"... points to a lack of history..."
Just when I thought it couldn't get any more stupid .....
Yeah right, that is what it was...SMART. Not petty and embarrassingly stupid. SMART with a capital *yawn*
uh, they're not new.
No. Of course not. We should help them. Should we help them over and over again, every single hurricane season?
I ask again. Do you carry this same bias and bigotry against fox, breitbart, cns, newsmax and the gateway pundit to name a few?