Certainly the verse which gives us the word "lucifer".
NOPE. That is NOT ok. I'd be PISSED if any adult did that to my son bc *I* would never do that to my son even though I'm his mother.
Neither are relevant enough to even view anymore.
So, if pressing the button causes much growth in those areas, would you press it?
It's what war gods are all about, isn't it?
As if "If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads" were in the same vein as "Hey, Jack overslept. Dang. OK, kill him." Still attempting to pass off black for white, eh?
Because the teachers you're complaining about aren't teaching children how to be gay. They're teaching science. Or English. Possibly history. None of those things violates the first amendment. Clergy members teaching children religion does violate the first amendment as public schools are part of the government and the government is not allowed to favor one religion over others. That's it. Period, full stop. Children can form religious groups. Don't tell me they can't - my kids went to school in Texas and there were plenty of them. They can attend comparative religion classes. They can even pray. What they cannot do is be taught that one religion is right or have their teachers lead them in prayer.
Lmao omg is he still whining. Dude needs to go get a friend sheesh.
My main point is...In most cases, things and people only have the control that you give it over you. If anyone let's someone else's penis or vagina rule over them, that's their own stupidity.
Who is doing that?
No way it needs to be played by Keenan.. Foxx was always mad that he never let him play Tyson.
I prefer "Yanni" over "yanny".
People believe in magic, that?s why we have believers in God.
I agree Protestants need to stop addi g and subtracting from the Word.
The answer is absolutely NO. No one is "reluctant" or "eager" to accept changes to scientific theory. All that matters is--Is there new information that either clarifies or discredits the existing understanding? Where is the evidence that supports this? How does this new information relate to other aspects of the Theory?
Ummm, you're just telling me you never had much of a science or math education, if you're not familiar with the concept of extrapolation.
What do I care who feeds the poor? Of course Christian food banks make people sit through a sermon before you feed them, whereas secular food banks just help. so it's a bit annoying that even feeding the masses you're always selling.
45 or more and nothing less
STC. Baa bye.
he may have. It's likely he did even if it hasn't come out. The story that was the most difficult to read was from Anthony Rapp talking about what Spacey did to him when he was a young teen :(
You're till trying to distract from, and thus defend a man demanding a child be kidnapped and sexually assaulted by a pedophile.
I think i should be something determined on a case by case basis. For example, it should result in very serious charges if a parent knew their child had all sorts of serious mental issues and yet they allowed their child easy access to firearms. Conversely, I don't think a parent should be punished if the parent didn't have any significant warning signs and/or had good reason to believe their kid had no access to their firearms.
You must be pissed by now ....lol
Yes, yes. You feel sorrow for me.
Read the article I linked to above and then get back to me.
Theism violates deistic beliefs. Deism is about a creator god that made everything then f*ked off somewhere else to ignore humanity and Earth as a whole. A non-interventionary god.
Ah yes, one of the most well substantiated scientific theories of all time, so silly to accept that.
Either everything is special, or nothing is special. I'm OK with both scenarios.