Just forgive people. Not set up an unwinnable situation. Actually care about people. Help people. You know, the stuff that a loving parent does for their child.
Y'all have some very different experiences with Christianity in the US than some of us have had.
Yes it does geh. They doubt natural selection is the way. They doubt gradualism and small change is cumulative. They think its something else. I say its God. That's all I say.
If you can locate one article of anyone anywhere praying to Obama, I'd love to see it.
That's fvcked up
Sure I agree that belief is a binary proposition but just because you believe X is possible does not mean you accept a story about X as true. A male Jew by the name Jesus existing in first century Palestine is not an extraordinary claim. The New Testament Gospel accounts are extraordinary claims that require sufficient evidence to shoulder the burden of their claims. All the evidence we have says it is not possible for a dead human to return from being dead. We have zero evidence this is even possible yet it is a claimed that it happened.
Paul didn't always dictate to scribes. He actually sometimes would point out if he was the one personally writing (Galatians 6:11: "See what large letters I make when I am writing in my own hand!")
WTF? It's not Friday? Heresy.
"That is slut shamming."
d'oh! ... good point ... post edited.
What is biased in this account of Muhammad's lifestory?
It is hard to be happy when dead, but utilitarians don't all agree on what values we should consider. Life, liberty, and happiness are all good candidates, and might be all considered at the same time.
A medical specific risk benefit analysis is not what I asked for. One cant uncircumcised a person so they can go back in time an re-experience life "whole" so the conclusions become opinion in this context. The same kind of opinion concerning what is or isn't harm. Its why I asked for a definition- one I never expect to get because there isn't any that apply.
that skill of folding notes up into little triangles.
Lol. You only prove just how uninformed you really are.
I will agree that many atheists are not anti-theists, if you will agree that many theists are not anti-atheists.
Right?! : )
Ah, I see... yeah, it was a bit too much of a Poe.
Something wrong with having principles and standing up to a tax-payer-paid liar?
I think your joke may have sailed over a few heads.
Jefferson was the sole author, but there were plenty of signatories on the DoI, and even more who subscribed to and fully supported what was written there.
Principle of non-contradiction. Completing claims can not both be true. Its illogical. First must come an acknowledgement that truth exists. Then the job is to seek it.
Marinated, with red wine.
"So the doctrine of substitutionary atonement is fundamentally unbiblical and religiously unnecessary"
Who says I am angry? And why do Christians always seem to come back with that lame response all the time of Why are you so angry? I am actually sitting here literally laughing my ass off at the both of you.
I think they are and were but he was a dog.
Von Braun wasn't involved in genocide like the SS butchers accommodated by Canada. Which you do not deny. Remember it next time you try to teach other people how to behave.
As Rudolph Bultmann so adequately stated: ??So unreliable are the Gospel accounts that we can now know nothing about the life or even the personality of Jesus.??
That's a big generalization there. Can say that about just any person or religion.
One Thing Leads To Another
Here is what the guy says in the text you referred to:
He wouldn't automatically know obviously, but many gay individual's know exactly I'm sure What he's all about, it's all one way traffic, He has shown himself to know very little, but a hell of a lot is known about him...