You know who.
Where does the word "invent" appear in that quote you have so foolishly posted over and over.
For a long time atheists were people who made the positive claim that gods don't exist. But with the explosion of open atheists, especially in the US, the more honest definition is someone that lacks belief in gods, as no one can know if gods exist or not.
You are convinced. People are convinced Elvis works at Burger King.
Why this "unelected judges" mantra? They've been unelected since the first Supreme Court. This is not a change from the Founding Fathers' vision. There was a reason the position of Supreme Court justice was designed not to be elected and to serve for life. They had to be independent, as much as possible, from changing politics. This was part of the plan, not a flaw.
Put some clothes on.
He shaved of the actual name of the pills then created a fake label for the bottle with her name. Diabolical
One way or the other, you're still a liar.
You need to update your bigoted stereotypes. They're taking care of their Blue Collar base, the vast majority of people who have snuck into the country to work illegally do so under a phony social. They're our meat packers, roofers, mechanics, cooks, construction etc. etc. etc. These are smart hard working people who can avail themselves of a foreign exchange rate to double or triple the perceived value of a $10 an hour job.
She is defending the ME terrorists over America. smh
Jesus also said he would return within the lifetimes of those alive when he ascended.
In this thread it seems Christians will find their true Identity. Jesus. I for one already found it. Just stay with us. Even if you do not believe in Us. We have been ordained by our Father to Love you no matter you believe or not. So you do not need to believe to be part of the Family. You are already. That is now from our side only. No force.
obama saved the economy
"I do not profess of being an expert in English, but "origin and birth" means descendants! Or not?"
I hope you?re teasing me.. ?
It's like saying if Islam is the link on Islamic terrorism why don't we hear of moroccans doing any.
I ignored that quack months ago.
hm... "rational fear" explain what that might look like, because you might have a point.
One doesn't have to be religious to find something morally repulsive, which is basically sin.
So this god of yours exists because you claim this god of yours exists. Talk about circularity--AND DOWNRIGHT DISHONESTY!
I didn't. I just said that we need to speak about it where it is about it. God does have a Wife. Now. But I do think we should speak about it in the thread created for it. This thread has another purpose and I do not want to be "off topic". Let us keep it orderly.
There is? Which interpretation is the correct one out of millions of them? And what authority do you have to claim that?
I was also considering the amount of attention from others blindness necessitates, but hey, I'm just an ignorant layman on this subject.
Christians haven't felt their hold on the moral high ground as threatened as the supposedly do now. The closest time might have been the 60s and 70s with all the peace protests, civil rights, and "counter culture". That time also saw a lot of extremism, violence, riots, etc. much of which went under reported I'd guess.
Celebrity guests include Idris Elba, The Beckhams, Oprah, the Clooneys, Serena Williams, James Corden, Troian Bellasario, the cast of Suits, and Priyanka Chopra.
I'm not buying any of that. A grand jury, not Mueller, indicted them, knowing full well that they would not face trial, because they believed, based on law, that the 13 Russians had violated law. Mueller indicted them, indirectly, by giving the evidence to a grand jury. What was this Russian company? When did they demand a trial and when did Mueller tell the judge that "they weren't ready for that yet"? I don't know how you define "fair and square" but with what went on with the Trump campaign, the Russians, and Comey's statement, I don't call that "fair and square". And I don't think that a system that allows a person to win with fewer individual votes is fair either even though that, obviously, isn't Trump's fault. BTW, Trump doesn't think it's fair either, even though he benefitted from it, because he said that presidential elections should be decided only by popular vote. I just know you're going to tell me the story about the three million illegal votes for Hillary. Don't even try. Like so much of what Trump says, he offered no proof of that. Do you seriously think that I'm going to be deterred because you think I'm making a fool of myself? As if I actually take that seriously? As if I value what you think? I know that Trump supporters are delusional but come on, man. You can't be that far gone, can you?
The effort to bring back the Fairness Act (which picked up the nickname "Hush Rush") was from Hinchey, Durban, and Feinstein at various times, not Obama (who gets the blame for anything proposed by any Democrat). In fact, Obama stated at the time that he was not in favor of reviving the Fairness act at all.
So, contextualizing means to ignore the parts that don't fit my pre-conceived conclusion?
I cut and pasted the writing of a newspaper. I then provided the link to that.